New Relic vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare New Relic and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. New Relic / Tempo.

Feature

New Relic

Monitoring

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
New Relic APM agent for Ruby applications
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 1,209
⭐ 5,545
Contributors
👥 308
👥 318
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Ruby
Go
Features
  • • Agent
  • • Apm Agent
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Ruby
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
  • • Tempo
  • • Traces
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
34/100 (stable)
79/100 (slowing)
Community Health
21/100 (needs-attention)
33/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
16/100 (experimental)
21/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
17/100 (traditional)
22/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
29/100 (high)
35/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
19/100 (poor)
22/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

New Relic Strengths

Tempo Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (5,545 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (318 contributors)

When to Use New Relic vs Tempo

Use New Relic when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

New Relic vs Grafana → Tempo vs Grafana → New Relic vs Prometheus → Tempo vs Prometheus → New Relic vs Loki → Tempo vs Loki → New Relic vs Jaeger → Tempo vs Jaeger → New Relic vs VictoriaMetrics → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics → New Relic vs Zipkin → Tempo vs Zipkin →

More Comparisons

View New Relic → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 10/25/2026