Jaeger vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Jaeger and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Jaeger / Tempo.

Feature

Jaeger

Monitoring

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Distributed tracing platform
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 23,337
⭐ 5,545
Contributors
👥 533
👥 318
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • • Cncf
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Jaeger
  • • Observability
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
  • • Tempo
  • • Traces
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
56/100 (stable)
79/100 (slowing)
Community Health
33/100 (needs-attention)
33/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
49/100 (emerging)
21/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
51/100 (evolving)
22/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
52/100 (low)
35/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
54/100 (needs-improvement)
22/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Jaeger Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (23,337 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (533 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

Tempo Strengths

When to Use Jaeger vs Tempo

Use Jaeger when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Jaeger vs Grafana → Tempo vs Grafana → Jaeger vs Prometheus → Tempo vs Prometheus → Jaeger vs Loki → Tempo vs Loki → Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics → Jaeger vs Zipkin → Tempo vs Zipkin → Jaeger vs Thanos → Tempo vs Thanos →

More Comparisons

View Jaeger → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 10/25/2026