Laravel vs Tempo: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Laravel and Tempo across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Laravel / Tempo.

Feature

Laravel

Web Framework

Tempo

Monitoring

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
PHP web application framework
Distributed tracing backend
GitHub Stars
⭐ 85,258
⭐ 5,545
Contributors
👥 864
👥 318
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Blade
Go
Features
  • • Framework
  • • Laravel
  • • Php
  • • Distributed Tracing
  • • Grafana
  • • Tempo
  • • Traces
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • grafana
Momentum Score
62/100 (stable)
79/100 (slowing)
Community Health
56/100 (moderate)
33/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
84/100 (established)
21/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
51/100 (evolving)
22/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
60/100 (low)
35/100 (medium)
Developer Experience
37/100 (poor)
22/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Laravel Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (85,258 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (864 contributors)

Tempo Strengths

  • ✓ More features (4 listed)

When to Use Laravel vs Tempo

Use Laravel when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tempo when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Laravel vs Django → Tempo vs Grafana → Laravel vs Spring Boot → Tempo vs Prometheus → Laravel vs Flask → Tempo vs Loki → Laravel vs Express.js → Tempo vs Jaeger → Laravel vs Ruby on Rails → Tempo vs VictoriaMetrics → Laravel vs Fastify → Tempo vs Zipkin →

More Comparisons

View Laravel → View Tempo → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 10/25/2026