OpenFaaS vs Trivy: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and Trivy across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / Trivy.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Trivy

Security

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Vulnerability scanner for containers
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,148
⭐ 34,832
Contributors
👥 187
👥 0
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • Docker
  • Faas
  • Functions
  • Functions As A Service
  • Gitops
  • Containers
  • Devsecops
  • Docker
  • Go
  • Golang
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
Momentum Score
14/100 (stable)
16/100 (slowing)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
12/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
28/100 (experimental)
11/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
70/100 (innovative)
20/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
5/100 (high)
Developer Experience
91/100 (excellent)
80/100 (good)
Links

OpenFaaS Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (187 contributors)

Trivy Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (34,832 stars)

When to Use OpenFaaS vs Trivy

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Trivy when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/5/2026