Nmap vs Trivy: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Nmap and Trivy across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Nmap / Trivy.

Feature

Nmap

Security

Trivy

Security

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Network discovery and security auditing
Vulnerability scanner for containers
GitHub Stars
⭐ 12,832
⭐ 34,832
Contributors
👥 61
👥 0
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
C
Go
Features
  • • Asynchronous
  • • C Plus Plus
  • • Libpcap
  • • Linux
  • • Lua
  • • Containers
  • • Devsecops
  • • Docker
  • • Go
  • • Golang
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
Momentum Score
26/100 (slowing)
16/100 (slowing)
Community Health
13/100 (needs-attention)
12/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
18/100 (experimental)
11/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
26/100 (traditional)
20/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
14/100 (high)
5/100 (high)
Developer Experience
24/100 (poor)
80/100 (good)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Nmap Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (61 contributors)

Trivy Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (34,832 stars)

When to Use Nmap vs Trivy

Use Nmap when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Trivy when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Nmap vs uBlock Origin → Trivy vs uBlock Origin → Nmap vs Metasploit → Trivy vs Metasploit → Nmap vs SQLMap → Trivy vs SQLMap → Nmap vs OWASP ZAP → Trivy vs OWASP ZAP → Nmap vs Wireshark → Trivy vs Wireshark → Nmap vs uBlock Origin → Trivy vs uBlock Origin →

More Comparisons

View Nmap → View Trivy → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026