OpenFaaS vs Longhorn: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and Longhorn across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / Longhorn.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Longhorn

Storage

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Distributed block storage for Kubernetes
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,148
⭐ 7,681
Contributors
👥 187
👥 157
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Shell
Features
  • • Docker
  • • Faas
  • • Functions
  • • Functions As A Service
  • • Gitops
  • • Cncf
  • • Distributed Systems
  • • High Availability
  • • K8s Sig Storage
  • • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
Momentum Score
14/100 (stable)
47/100 (slowing)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
23/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
28/100 (experimental)
18/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
70/100 (innovative)
26/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
22/100 (high)
Developer Experience
91/100 (excellent)
24/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

OpenFaaS Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (26,148 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (187 contributors)

Longhorn Strengths

When to Use OpenFaaS vs Longhorn

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Longhorn when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

OpenFaaS vs Knative → Longhorn vs MinIO → OpenFaaS vs Kubernetes → Longhorn vs Rook → OpenFaaS vs Docker → Longhorn vs Kubernetes → OpenFaaS vs MinIO → Longhorn vs Docker → OpenFaaS vs Istio → Longhorn vs Istio → OpenFaaS vs Docker Compose → Longhorn vs Docker Compose →

More Comparisons

View OpenFaaS → View Longhorn → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/5/2026