OpenFaaS vs Helm: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and Helm across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / Helm.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Helm

Package Manager

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Package manager for Kubernetes
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,230
⭐ 30,194
Contributors
👥 187
👥 1,029
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • • Docker
  • • Faas
  • • Functions
  • • Functions As A Service
  • • Gitops
  • • Chart
  • • Charts
  • • Cncf
  • • Helm
  • • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
Momentum Score
14/100 (stable)
81/100 (stable)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
76/100 (good)
Maturity Index
27/100 (experimental)
66/100 (growing)
Innovation Score
69/100 (progressive)
75/100 (innovative)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
67/100 (low)
Developer Experience
90/100 (excellent)
53/100 (needs-improvement)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

OpenFaaS Strengths

Helm Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (30,194 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (1,029 contributors)

When to Use OpenFaaS vs Helm

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Helm when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

OpenFaaS vs Knative → Helm vs Kubernetes → OpenFaaS vs Kubernetes → Helm vs Docker → OpenFaaS vs Docker → Helm vs MinIO → OpenFaaS vs MinIO → Helm vs Istio → OpenFaaS vs Istio → Helm vs Drone → OpenFaaS vs Drone → Helm vs Docker Compose →

More Comparisons

View OpenFaaS → View Helm → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 8/30/2026