OpenFaaS vs Helm: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare OpenFaaS and Helm across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. OpenFaaS / Helm.

Feature

OpenFaaS

Serverless

Helm

Package Manager

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Serverless functions made simple
Package manager for Kubernetes
GitHub Stars
⭐ 26,148
⭐ 29,777
Contributors
👥 187
👥 998
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Go
Go
Features
  • Docker
  • Faas
  • Functions
  • Functions As A Service
  • Gitops
  • Chart
  • Charts
  • Cncf
  • Helm
  • Kubernetes
Integrations
  • • kubernetes
  • • docker
  • • aws
  • • kubernetes
Momentum Score
14/100 (stable)
79/100 (stable)
Community Health
34/100 (needs-attention)
73/100 (good)
Maturity Index
28/100 (experimental)
67/100 (growing)
Innovation Score
70/100 (innovative)
76/100 (innovative)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
25/100 (high)
68/100 (low)
Developer Experience
91/100 (excellent)
54/100 (needs-improvement)
Links

OpenFaaS Strengths

Helm Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (29,777 stars)
  • ✓ Larger community (998 contributors)

When to Use OpenFaaS vs Helm

Use OpenFaaS when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Helm when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026