Playwright vs Puppeteer: Diferencas principais e quando usar cada um

Análise abrangente das principais diferenças, casos de uso e sinais da comunidade.

Diferencas principais

Compare Playwright e Puppeteer em recursos, preco, integracoes e metricas da comunidade. Playwright / Puppeteer.

Recurso

Playwright

Testing

Puppeteer

Testing

Compare ferramentas para desenvolvedores lado a lado com métricas reais.
Cross-browser web automation
Puppeteer is a JavaScript API for automating Chrome and Firefox browsers, allowing developers to perform headless browser testing and automation.
GitHub Stars
⭐ 87.902
⭐ No data available
Contributors
👥 738
👥 No data available
Pricing
✓ Grátis
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Grátis
Languages
TypeScript
JavaScript TypeScript
Features
  • Automation
  • Chrome
  • Chromium
  • E2e Testing
  • Electron
  • Headless browser automation
  • Cross-browser support for Chrome and Firefox
  • JavaScript API
  • Node.js integration
Integrations
No integrations listed
  • • Chrome
  • • Firefox
  • • Node.js
Momentum Score
79/100 (slowing)
6/100 (stable)
Community Health
50/100 (developing)
6/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
71/100 (established)
5/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
76/100 (innovative)
7/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
62/100 (low)
5/100 (high)
Developer Experience
68/100 (fair)
5/100 (poor)
Links

Playwright Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (87.902 estrelas)
  • ✓ Larger community (738 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

Puppeteer Strengths

Quando usar Playwright vs Puppeteer

Use Playwright quando seus pontos fortes se encaixarem melhor no seu stack e equipe, e escolha Puppeteer quando ecossistema, integracoes ou custo forem mais adequados.

Data source: GitHub API

Última atualização 5/4/2026