Playwright vs Selenium: Key Differences & When to Use Each
Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics
Key Differences
Compare Playwright and Selenium across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Playwright / Selenium.
Feature
Playwright
Testing
Selenium
Testing
Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Cross-browser web automation
Browser automation framework
GitHub Stars
⭐ 98,462
⭐ 34,566
Contributors
👥 823
👥 955
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
TypeScript
Java
Features
- • Automation
- • Chrome
- • Chromium
- • E2e Testing
- • Electron
- • Dotnet
- • Java
- • Javascript
- • Python
- • Ruby
Integrations
No integrations listed
No integrations listed
Momentum Score
62/100Momentum626262
(slowing)
71/100Momentum717171
(stable)
Community Health
56/100Health565656
(moderate)
51/100Health515151
(developing)
Maturity Index
73/100Maturity737373
(established)
70/100Maturity707070
(established)
Innovation Score
82/100Innovation828282
(innovative)
69/100Innovation696969
(progressive)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
60/100Risk606060
(low)
67/100Risk676767
(low)
Developer Experience
68/100DX686868
(fair)
68/100DX686868
(fair)
Links
Playwright Strengths
- ✓ More popular (98,462 stars)
Selenium Strengths
- ✓ Larger community (955 contributors)
When to Use Playwright vs Selenium
Use Playwright when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Selenium when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.
Related comparisons
More Comparisons
Data source: GitHub API
Last updated: 10/25/2026