Gatsby vs Next.js: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Gatsby and Next.js across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Gatsby / Next.js.

Feature

Gatsby

Frontend

Next.js

Frontend

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Static site generator for React
React framework for production
GitHub Stars
⭐ 55,942
⭐ 141,145
Contributors
👥 4,379
👥 4,120
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
JavaScript
JavaScript
Features
  • • Blog
  • • Compiler
  • • Gatsby
  • • Graphql
  • • React
  • • Blog
  • • Browser
  • • Compiler
  • • Components
  • • Hybrid
Integrations
No integrations listed
No integrations listed
Momentum Score
29/100 (stable)
81/100 (stable)
Community Health
81/100 (good)
85/100 (excellent)
Maturity Index
87/100 (mature)
95/100 (mature)
Innovation Score
87/100 (pioneering)
95/100 (pioneering)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
94/100 (minimal)
94/100 (minimal)
Developer Experience
80/100 (good)
80/100 (good)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Gatsby Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (4,379 contributors)

Next.js Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (141,145 stars)

When to Use Gatsby vs Next.js

Use Gatsby when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Next.js when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Gatsby vs React → Next.js vs React → Gatsby vs Angular → Next.js vs Angular → Gatsby vs Svelte → Next.js vs Svelte → Gatsby vs Nuxt → Next.js vs Nuxt → Gatsby vs Vue.js → Next.js vs Vue.js → Gatsby vs Storybook → Next.js vs Storybook →

More Comparisons

View Gatsby → View Next.js → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 7/28/2026