Exa vs Tmux: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Exa and Tmux across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Exa / Tmux.

Feature

Exa

Dev Tools

Tmux

Dev Tools

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Modern replacement for ls
Terminal multiplexer
GitHub Stars
⭐ 24,442
⭐ 45,105
Contributors
👥 163
👥 41
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Rust
C
Features
  • • Command Line
  • • Files
  • • Ls
  • • Rust
  • • Open Source
  • • dev-tools
Integrations
No integrations listed
No integrations listed
Momentum Score
12/100 (stable)
22/100 (slowing)
Community Health
18/100 (needs-attention)
13/100 (needs-attention)
Maturity Index
23/100 (experimental)
20/100 (experimental)
Innovation Score
21/100 (traditional)
15/100 (traditional)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
22/100 (high)
13/100 (high)
Developer Experience
24/100 (poor)
16/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Exa Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (163 contributors)
  • ✓ More features (4 listed)

Tmux Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (45,105 stars)

When to Use Exa vs Tmux

Use Exa when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Tmux when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Exa vs Oh My Zsh → Tmux vs Oh My Zsh → Exa vs VS Code → Tmux vs VS Code → Exa vs Node.js → Tmux vs Node.js → Exa vs Neovim → Tmux vs Neovim → Exa vs FZF → Tmux vs FZF → Exa vs Ripgrep → Tmux vs Ripgrep →

More Comparisons

View Exa → View Tmux → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 5/4/2026