Bat vs Fish Shell: Key Differences & When to Use Each

Comprehensive side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and metrics

Key Differences

Compare Bat and Fish Shell across features, pricing, integrations, and community metrics. Bat / Fish Shell.

Feature

Bat

Dev Tools

Fish Shell

Dev Tools

Side-by-side comparison of developer tools
Cat clone with syntax highlighting
User-friendly command line shell
GitHub Stars
⭐ 59,514
⭐ 33,771
Contributors
👥 482
👥 1,247
Pricing
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
✓ Free
Enterprise: Contact sales
Languages
Rust
Rust
Features
  • • Cli
  • • Command Line
  • • Git
  • • Hacktoberfest
  • • Rust
  • • Fish
  • • Rust
  • • Shell
  • • Terminal
Integrations
No integrations listed
No integrations listed
Momentum Score
30/100 (slowing)
38/100 (slowing)
Community Health
39/100 (needs-attention)
51/100 (developing)
Maturity Index
50/100 (emerging)
63/100 (growing)
Innovation Score
59/100 (progressive)
43/100 (evolving)
Risk Score (higher is safer)
44/100 (medium)
76/100 (minimal)
Developer Experience
91/100 (excellent)
36/100 (poor)
Links
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub
🌐 Visit Website View on GitHub

Bat Strengths

  • ✓ More popular (59,514 stars)
  • ✓ More features (5 listed)

Fish Shell Strengths

  • ✓ Larger community (1,247 contributors)

When to Use Bat vs Fish Shell

Use Bat when its strengths align better with your stack and team needs, and choose Fish Shell when its ecosystem, integrations, or cost profile is a better fit.

Related comparisons

Bat vs Oh My Zsh → Fish Shell vs Oh My Zsh → Bat vs VS Code → Fish Shell vs VS Code → Bat vs Node.js → Fish Shell vs Node.js → Bat vs Neovim → Fish Shell vs Neovim → Bat vs FZF → Fish Shell vs FZF → Bat vs Ripgrep → Fish Shell vs Ripgrep →

More Comparisons

View Bat → View Fish Shell → Search More Tools →

Data source: GitHub API

Last updated: 7/2/2026